Short answer
Stay on Kambi if your advantage is brand, marketing or distribution and you need one sportsbook across many regulated markets: Kambi says its Turnkey Sportsbook is licensed in 100+ regulated jurisdictions.[1] Consider leaving when the revenue share has become your largest technology cost and your product needs changes to the sportsbook core itself. Plan the move around the contract end date: in the DraftKings and Penn agreements Kambi published, the same revenue share applied to migrated revenue until the agreed date.[2][3]
Kambi is a B2B sportsbook supplier. It was spun off from Unibet in 2014 and its shares trade on Nasdaq First North in Stockholm.[4] It sells a Turnkey Sportsbook and, separately, Odds Feed+: pre-match and live odds "delivered through a single API integration". Its site says it works with more than 70 operators.[1]
Kambi's own quarterly report describes the fee: "Kambi charges its operators a fee based on a number of variables including fixed fees, the number of live events offered and commission based on a revenue share of operators' Gross Gaming Revenue (GGR) less deductible costs, such as certain capped marketing incentives and tax", which the report calls NGR. Some contracts include "tiers with lower commission rates on the higher levels of their sports betting revenue".[3] No rate card is published, and a third-party review lists Kambi as "Quote-only".[5]
The reports also record operators moving off. Kambi's 2025 revenue was €162.0m, down 8.2%. Excluding "€12.5m of transition fees received in the same period in 2024", full-year revenue fell 1.2%, and the Q4 2025 report says "the headwinds associated with the planned migrations of FDJ UNITED and LeoVegas will continue".[6]
| Kambi Turnkey Sportsbook | Own sportsbook | |
|---|---|---|
| Code and data ownership | The platform stays Kambi's; operators pay for it through fees and a revenue share.[3] A third-party review lists the operator as the data owner.[5] | The code and the data are yours under your build contract. On amBrain projects: "The client keeps full ownership of the product and the code, except our reusable components." |
| Cost model | Fixed fees, a fee tied to the number of live events offered and commission on NGR; lower commission tiers at higher revenue in some contracts.[3] Rates are not published.[5] | Build cost first, then run cost: hosting, odds data, certification, trading and on-call staff. No share of GGR. |
| Time to launch | Not published by Kambi. | Set by scope and by certification in each market. |
| Lock-in: term, notice, migration | Third-party review, marked there as editorial inference: "Multi-year; commonly at least 3 years for strategic Turnkey deals"; the same review lists exclusivity and change-of-control as "Yes".[5] The DraftKings and Penn (retail) agreements kept the same revenue share on migrated revenue until the agreed dates.[2][3] | Your contract with the builder. Changing the engineering team does not switch the product off. |
| Customisation | Kambi's product and roadmap, with "an extensive suite of differentiation tools".[1] | Pricing, risk rules, bet types, front end and bonus logic are yours to change. The defects are yours too. |
| Certification and compliance | Licensed in 100+ regulated jurisdictions, per Kambi.[1] In Q4 2023, 94% of its sportsbook revenue came from locally regulated markets.[3] | You certify. Event-wagering systems are tested against standards such as GLI-33 Event Wagering Systems v1.1,[7] and in Great Britain the Gambling Commission's remote gambling software licence is what allows a business to "manufacture, supply, install or adapt gambling software by means of remote communication".[8] |
| Latency and scale | No latency or uptime figure on the Kambi pages checked. | You size for your own peak, such as a derby or a final, and measure it yourself. |
| Exit cost | In the two published cases, revenue share on migrated revenue until the agreed date.[2][3] Transition services are paid: Kambi's Q4 2023 revenue included fixed revenues of €3.3m from Penn for transition services.[3] | No licence to exit. Moving to another engineering team costs handover time, not a fee. |
The same sequence for a white label, with licence and payment accounts in the first step, is covered in moving from a white label to your own platform.
These are the cost drivers, not a price.
Through fixed fees, a fee tied to the number of live events offered and a commission on operators' GGR less deductible costs (NGR). Some contracts have lower commission rates at higher revenue.[3] Kambi does not publish its rates.
A third-party review states that operators own the player relationship and player data.[9] Ownership is not the same as a usable export. Agree the format, the completeness (balances, bonus state, bet history) and the delivery schedule before you give notice.
Yes. Odds Feed+ is sold separately through a single API,[1] and Kindred continued with Odds Feed+ after its in-house decision and its acquisition by FDJ.[4] That record shows one split in practice: your own platform, rented prices. Whether your contract allows a partial exit, and at what fee, is a question for the contract, not for the product page.
The calendar is set by what you scope: the number of markets, certification in each, in-house or rented odds, and the integrations you need.
Disclosure: this page is published by amBrain. From amBrain's iGaming services: "Casino platform development with online casino games, sports betting engine, and player management." Every Kambi fact on this page links to its source. Kambi and Odds Feed+ are trademarks of their owner and are used only to identify the products discussed.
Related